A new forest perspectives paper delves into the complexities of forest disturbance and damage monitoring, offering insights to improve regional frameworks for reporting these crucial environmental metrics. The study highlights the distinct meanings and management implications of “forest disturbance” and “forest damage”—terms often used interchangeably but that differ in ways that affect data collection, interpretation, and response strategies.

Key areas of exploration include the ecological processes underlying disturbances and damage, such as the challenges posed by diverse causal factors and spatial and temporal inconsistencies. These complexities make it difficult to ensure consistent reporting across regions and countries, as measurement protocols vary widely.

The paper also underscores that while data aggregation on forest disturbances is challenging, it is essential to bridge the gap between concept and practical application. A standardized approach to monitoring could enhance scientific understanding and support informed policy-making and environmental management on a global scale, reinforcing the resilience of forests against ongoing ecological pressures.